Abstract
The “weaning” from mechanical ventilation is a process that involves several assessments and steps to aid a patient to reach a “liberation” from the ventilator and allow for breathing autonomy.
The process of “weaning” from mechanical ventilation involves several assessments and steps to support a patient in reaching a “liberation” from the ventilator and allow for spontaneous breathing. The weaning process consists of evaluating if the patient is able to breathe with minimal or no ventilation support. This assessment is performed by a diagnostic test named spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), repeated every 24 hours to ensure extubation success. Even though many patients do not meet the eligibility criteria for starting the weaning process, they can still be weaned. For this reason, these criteria should be evaluated in order to assess a possible weaning, rather than adopting absolute standards which have to be met simultaneously. The SBT helps the healthcare professionals to understand the patient’s capacity to sustain physiological breathing once they are extubated (or on spontaneous breathing if a tracheostomy tube is maintained in place). Several patients fail to meet the weaning criteria after less than 20 minutes of the SBT. Therefore, a 30-minute trial is enough to estimate the patient’s capacity to withhold spontaneous breathing.
Even if the SBT is currently the gold standard method to conduct the weaning trial, it does not prevent the occurrence of complications after extubation such as upper airways obstruction, increased resistance, loss of airway protective reflexes, cough efficiency, and drainage of tracheobronchial secretions. The preventive use of NIV or High Flow Nasal Cannula is strongly recommended for patients experiencing extubation failure and mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours after an SBT.
A well-performed SBT usually leads to definitive extubation; on the other hand, SBT failure requires a comprehensive investigation on potentially reversible conditions. Prolonged weaning is highly wasteful in terms of time and resources due to the need for a systematic and multidisciplinary approach to successfully face the weaning process.
References
Perren A, Brochard L. Managing the apparent and hidden difficulties of weaning from mechanical
ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(11):1885-95.
Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033–1056.
Sklar MC, Burns K, Rittayamai N, et al. Effort to Breathe with Various Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Techniques. A Physiologic Meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(11):1477-1485.
Pinsky MR. Breathing as exercise: the cardiovascular response to weaning from mechanical ventilation.
Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(9):1164–1166.
Pellegrini JA, Moraes RB, Maccari JG, et al. Spontaneous Breathing Trials With T-Piece or Pressure Support.
Respir Care. 2016;61(12):1693-1703.
Esteban A, Alía I, Tobin MJ, et al. Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to
discontinue mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
;159(2):512-8.
Medeiros GC, Sassi FC, Lirani-Silva C, Andrade CR. Criteria for tracheostomy decannulation: literature
review. Codas. 2019;31(6):e20180228.
Singh RK, Saran S, Baronia AK. The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review. J Intensive
Care. 2017;20;5:38.
Thille AW, Richard CM, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2013;187(12): 1294–1302.
Quintard H, l’Her E, Pottecher J, et al. Intubation and extubation of the ICU patient. Anaesth Crit Care Pain
Med. 2017;36(5):327-341.
Fan E, Zakhary B, Amaral A, et al. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults Liberation
from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official ATS/ACCP Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann
Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(3):441-443.
Thille AW, Richard JC, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1523CI.
Maclntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing
ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians, the
American Association for Respiratory Care, and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest.
;120(6):375S-95S.
Béduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, et al. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition.
The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(6):772-783.
Authors retain copyright in their work and do not transfer copyright to the Journal or Publisher.
Authors grant iEditore a non-exclusive right of first publication and a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, preserve, and make the article available as part of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Nursing and Health.
The published Version of Record is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence permits readers and other third parties to copy, share, distribute, reproduce, adapt, translate, and reuse the published article, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given, a link to the licence is supplied, and any changes are indicated.
Authors may share, deposit, reproduce, distribute, adapt, and otherwise reuse their own original work without requesting permission from the Journal or Publisher. The CC BY 4.0 licence governs reuse by readers and other third parties and does not restrict the authors’ exercise of the copyright they retain.
Third-party material that is not included under the article’s Creative Commons licence must be clearly identified in the relevant credit line, figure legend, table note, or accompanying statement and may require separate permission for reuse.
