Characteristics of obstetric’s care provided to pregnant woman qualified for invasive prenatal tests
PDF (Polish)

Keywords

prenatal diagnosis
pregnancy
fetus

How to Cite

Characteristics of obstetric’s care provided to pregnant woman qualified for invasive prenatal tests. (2015). Modern Nursing and Public Health, 4(4), 106-109. https://journals.ieditore.com/index.php/MNHC/article/view/995

Abstract

Nowadays prenatal diagnosis is an issue that concerns almost every couple expecting a baby. Desire for the participation in this screening is an individual issue. Prenatal examination should not be imposed or limited. Acting with accordance to patient’s rights is necessary for prenatal diagnosis to cater for the society needs and to serve the society in the right way. The objective in this article is focusing attention on the care given to pregnant women participating in prenatal diagnosis and with indication for continuing diagnosis with invasive methods. This paper presents a case study. Based on the interview with the patient, patient’s observation and analysis of documentation, the main problems were selected. These problems were experienced by the pregnant patient who was qualified for the amniocentesis because of the 1:300 risk score estimated in PAPP-A test in 13. week of pregnancy. The interview, observations and documentations were used for creating the care process which is the essential research tool in this case study. This article analyses biological, psychological and social problems which occur during this patient’s pregnancy. The paper discusses categories of problems concerning the patient’s psychological sphere, explaining the supportive and educational role of midwife. Proposed activities improve level of the pregnant women’s care and increase comfort of patients participating in the screening. The issue is undertaken mainly by psychologists of the procreation. Updating midwive’s knowledge in the topic of the prenatal diagnosis is necessary, because this issue is still marginally discussed in the medical community. It should change, if the midwives want to surround women with holistic care where all team members are cooperating with each other.
PDF (Polish)

References

Szymona-Pałkowska K. Psychologiczna analiza doświadczeń rodzi-ców w sytuacji ciąży wysokiego ryzyka. Lublin: Towarzystwo Nauko-we KUL; 2005.

Bielawska-Batorowicz E. Psychologiczne aspekty prokreacji. Kato-wice: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Śląsk; 2006: 111–181.

Fedor-Freybergh PG. Dziecko prenatalne. Psychosomatyczna specyfi-ka okresu prenatalnego i perinatalnego jako środowiska życia dziec-ka. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls; 2014.

Łukasik R, Woś H. Różne formy kontaktu rodziców z dzieckiem przed narodzeniem. Probl Pielęg 2013; 21(1): 137–140.

Kornas-Biela D. Psychologiczne problemy poradnictwa genetycznego i diagnostyki prenatalnej. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL; 1996.

Bień A, Pilewska-Kozak AB. Diagnostyka prenatalna. W: Makara-Stu-dzińska M, Iwanowicz-Palus G, red. Psychologia w położnictwie i gine-kologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PZWL; 2009: 177–183.

Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczą-ce postępowania w zakresie diagnostyki prenatalnej. Ginekol Pol 2009; 80: 390–393.

Zespół do spraw opracowania programu badań prenatalnych w Polsce. Program badań prenatalnych [cyt. 20.02.2015]. Dostępny na URL: http://www2.mz.gov.pl/wwwfiles/ma_struktura/docs/ ppz_prenatalnych_2004.pdf.

Green JM. What is the EPDS measuring and how should we use it in re-search? In: Henshaw C, Elliott S, Cox J, eds. Screening for perinatal depression. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2005: 141–145.

Czub M. Znaczenie wczesnych więzi społecznych dla rozwoju emo-cjonalnego dziecka. Forum Oświat 2003; 2(29): 31–49.

Abramsky L, Chappelle J, red. Diagnostyka prenatalna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 1996.

Baston H, Hall J. Monitorowanie dobrostanu emocjonalnego kobiety w ciąży. Przedporodowe badania przesiewowe dotyczące nieprawidłowości płodu. W: Kaleta M, red. wyd. pol. Przed porodem. Wrocław: Elsevier Urban & Partner; 2011: 68–83, 100–115.