Abstract
Introduction. Neonatal and pediatric patients present an increased risk of skin injuries due to their immature skin barrier and frequent exposure to medical devices. To improve prevention, monitoring, and standardization of care, the Azienda USL Toscana Centro (AUTC), one of the largest healthcare organizations in Italy, implemented a corporate pediatric wound care model supported by a multidisciplinary working group.
Methods. This descriptive retrospective observational study was conducted within an institutional Quality Improvement framework. Aggregated anonymized data were collected annually from 2021 to 2024 across Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), Neonatology units, and Pediatric wards. Nurse representatives, coordinated by a pediatric wound care specialist from the corporate Wound Care Team, reviewed medical records to identify pressure injuries (PIs), medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). Total admissions and injury frequencies were reported for each setting.
Results. Over the four-year period, 12,818 admissions were recorded (mean 3,204.5 per year). The mean incidence of PIs was 0.47%, while IAD incidence averaged 5.13%, with higher rates observed in NICUs. Between 2021 and 2024, 149 healthcare professionals (nurses, physicians, and midwives) completed seven editions of a dedicated pediatric wound care training program. The pediatric wound care working group expanded from 6 to 9 nurses and 1 physician, meeting quarterly to review surveillance data, discuss clinical challenges, and update procedures. In 2024, the corporate procedure for the prevention and treatment of neonatal and pediatric skin injuries was revised, and an inter-organizational pathway for the management of minor pediatric burns was jointly developed with Meyer IRCCS Children’s Hospital.
Discussion and conclusions. The corporate wound care model supported consistent monitoring, widespread training, and standardized preventive practices across AUTC. The very low incidence of PIs and the stable burden of IAD indicate positive organizational impact, highlighting the value of sustained multidisciplinary engagement in pediatric skin injury prevention.
References
1. Bargos-Munárriz M., Bermúdez-Pérez M., Martínez-Alonso A.M., García-Molina P., Orts-Cortés M.I. Prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill children: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2020;29(4):310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2020.08.005
2. Neonatal and Pediatric Wound Care, G. Ciprandi editor, Minerva Medica
3. Şimşek E., Demir A.S., Semerci R., Karadağ A. The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.06.019
4. Baharestani MM. An overview of neonatal and pediatric wound care knowledge and considerations. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Jun;53(6):34-6, 38, 40, passim.
5. Delmore B, Deppisch M, Sylvia C, Luna-Anderson C, Nie AM. Pressure Injuries in the Pediatric Population: A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel White Paper. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019 Sep;32(9):394-408. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000577124.58253.66
6. Azienda USL Toscana centro [Internet]. Firenze: USL Toscana centro; [cited 2025 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.uslcentro.toscana.it/
7. Mlambo M, Silén C, McGrath C. Lifelong learning and nurses' continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2
8. Family and community nursing: overview of practice in Europe. Conti A, Albanesi B, Busca E, Martini L, Costa C, Campagna S. Assist Inferm Ric. 2021 Jul-Sep;40(3):131-136. https://doi.org/10.1702/3694.36821.
9. Moore Z., Dowsett C., Smith G., Atkin L., Bain M., Lahmann N.A., Schultz G.S., Swanson T., Vowden P., Weir D., Zmuda A., Jaimes H. TIME CDST: An updated tool to address the current challenges in wound care. Journal of Wound Care. 2019;28(3):154–161. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.3.154
10. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411.
11. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S31–S34. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
12. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng (last accessed: 2024-11-02)
13. Başbakkal Z, Yilmaz HB, Gümüş M, Belli M, Erçelik ZE. Medical device-related pressure in-juries in paediatric patients: An incidence study in a children's hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(7):2633-2639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16973
14. Nicolosi B, et al. Predictive Performance of Device-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale to Evaluating Pressure Injuries Risk in the Neonates: An Observational Multicenter Study. J Clin Nurs. 2025 May. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17825.
15. Nicolosi B, Parente E, Marilli I, Prisco R, Gregorini M, Ciofi D. Investigation of the preva-lence of skin injuries in hospitalized newborns and main reports: an observational, cross-sectional, monocentric pilot study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Nursing and Health. 2024;3(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.36253/if-2412
16. Nicolosi B, Gregorini M, Granai V, Maffeo M, Buccione E, Longobucco Y, Bamonte C, Stringi D, Idrizaj S, Fontani I, Parente E, Ciofi D. Risk Factors for Skin Injuries in Hospita-lized Children: a Retrospective Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Nursing and Health. 2024;3(4):277–285. https://doi.org/10.36253/if-3159
17. Stellar JJ, Hasbani NR, Kulik LA, et al. Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries in In-fants and Children. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47(5):459-469. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000683
18. Delmore B, Deppisch M, Sylvia C, Luna-Anderson C, Nie AM. Pressure Injuries in the Pediatric Population: A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel White Paper. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019;32(9):394-408. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000577124.58253.66
19. Sainz-Rozas PB, Gros-Turpin A, Balaguer-López E, Mora Morillo IM, De Frutos Pecharro-man J, González Garcia L, Cañadas DC, Cánovas Barcelona M, Fàbregas Mitjans M, García-Molina P. Prevention Decalogue for Dependency-Related Skin Lesions in Neonates: a Con-sensus-Based Delphi Study. Int J Wound Res. 2025;1(1):33–45. https://doi.org/10.64115/ijwr-2025-2
20. Balaguer-López E, Estañ-Capell J, Rodrígez Dolz MC, Barberá Ventura MC, Ruescas López M, García-Molina P. Incidence of incontinence-associated dermatitis in hospi-talised neonates. Adaptation and validation of a severity scale. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2024;100(6):420-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2024.04.015
21. Nicolosi B, Parente E, Petronici A, Fioravanti L, Cavalieri S, Nobile V, Reggiardo G, Coletta R, Moroni M, Ciprandi G. Moisture-associated skin damage and its management in neonatal and infant populations: a retrospective study in Italy. J Wound Care. 2025;34(9):732–738. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0178
22. Baharestani MM, Ratliff CR. Pediatric pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007;34(4):411–420. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000281643.35669.1a.
23. Moore Z, Dowsett C, Smith G, et al. TIME CDST: an updated tool to address the cur-rent challenges in wound care. J Wound Care. 2019;28(3):154-161. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.3.154
24. Cavalieri S, Costa A, Buratti S, Moscatelli A, Scelsi S. Effective preventive strategies for pressure injuries in neonatal and pediatric intensive care: analysis of an implemented pathway. Int J Wound Res. 2025;1(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.64115/ijwr-2025-5.
