Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressings With Silver Rebalance Protease Activity in Venous Ulcer Fibroblasts: Translational Implications for Clinical Practice
PDF

Keywords

Oxidized Cellulose
Silver
Venous Ulcer
Wound Healing
Metalloproteinases

How to Cite

Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressings With Silver Rebalance Protease Activity in Venous Ulcer Fibroblasts: Translational Implications for Clinical Practice. (2026). International Journal of Wound Research, 2(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.64115/ijwr-2026-341

Abstract

Introduction. Chronic venous leg ulcers disproportionately affect older adults and are characterized by delayed healing, high recurrence rates, and substantial impacts on quality of life and healthcare costs. Persistent inflammation and an imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors contribute to healing failure, maintaining the wound in an inflammatory state. Oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen dressings, with and without silver, accelerate healing in venous ulcers, but the cellular mechanisms linking these outcomes to changes in the wound microenvironment are not fully understood. This study evaluated how oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen and oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver modulate venous ulcer fibroblasts, focusing on proteases, their endogenous inhibitors and key growth factors, to connect in vitro findings to potential clinical applications.

Methods. Fibroblasts were isolated from chronic venous leg ulcers and cultured for 72 hours in control medium, oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen (2.8 mg/mL) or oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver (4.2 mg/mL). Cell metabolic activity was assessed by MTT assay. MMP 1, MMP 2, MMP 3, MMP 10, MMP 13, TIMP 1, TIMP 2, TIMP 3 and TGF β1, TGF β2, TGF β3 were quantified in conditioned media using bead based multiplex immunoassays. Vimentin, collagen type I and collagen type III expression were evaluated by immunofluorescence. Statistical analysis used the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test (p< 0.05).

Results: Both dressings maintained venous leg ulcer fibroblast metabolic activity at levels comparable to, or slightly higher than, control medium, without evidence of overt cytotoxicity. Oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen alone did not significantly alter MMPs, TIMPs or TGF β isoforms. Oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver significantly increased MMP 1 (p = 0.0002) and reduced MMP 13 (p = 0.0155) versus control, while decreasing TIMP 2 and TIMP 3 and preserving TIMP 1. TGF β1, TGF β2, TGF β3 and collagen type I and III expression remained unchanged across groups, and vimentin expression was preserved.

Discussion. In this in vitro model, oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen and oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver preserved fibroblast viability and did not overtly interfere with TGF β signaling or collagen type I and III expression. The silver free matrix did not modify the analyzed protease inhibitor levels, supporting a predominantly extracellular protease sequestering mechanism. The silver containing matrix induced a shift in the fibroblast derived protease inhibitor profile, characterized by increased MMP 1, decreased MMP 13 and reduced TIMP 2 and TIMP 3 with preserved TIMP 1, a pattern that may rebalance protease activity toward matrix remodeling under non cytotoxic conditions. These findings offer a mechanistic, hypothesis generating framework with translational implications for the clinical use of silver-containing oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen dressings in venous leg ulcers.

PDF

References

1. Rochon PJ, Reghunathan A, Kapoor BS, Kalva SP, Fidelman N, Majdalany BS, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lower Extremity Chronic Venous Disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20(11s):S481-s500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.011

2. Meaume S, Senet P, Thomé B, Aragno VA, Bohbot S, Fortin S, et al. Aetiological treatment of venous leg ulcers with compression therapy: real-life outcomes with two different procedures. J Wound Care. 2023;32(10):615-23. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.10.615

3. Probst S, Saini C, Gschwind G, Stefanelli A, Bobbink P, Pugliese MT, et al. Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(9):3906-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14272

4. Ligi D, Mosti G, Croce L, Raffetto JD, Mannello F. Chronic venous disease – Part I: Inflammatory biomarkers in wound healing. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2016;1862(10):1964-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.07.018

5. Westby MJ, Norman G, Dumville JC, Stubbs N, Cullum N. Protease-modulating matrix treatments for healing venous leg ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;12:Cd011918. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011918.pub2

6. Cullen B, Gefen A. The biological and physiological impact of the performance of wound dressings. Int Wound J. 2023;20(4):1292-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13960

7. Wollina U, Schmidt WD, Kronert C, Nelskamp C, Scheibe A, Fassler D. Some effects of a topical collagen-based matrix on the microcirculation and wound healing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: preliminary observations. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005;4(4):214-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734605283001

8. Vin F, Teot L, Meaume S. The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 2002;11(9):335-41. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2002.11.9.26438

9. Wu S, Applewhite AJ, Niezgoda J, Snyder R, Shah J, Cullen B, et al. Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressings: Review of Evidence and Recommendations. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2017;30(11 Suppl 1):S1-S18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000525951.20270.6c

10. Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, Silcock D, Morrison L. Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2002;10(1):16-25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10703.x

11. Cullen B, Watt PW, Lundqvist C, Silcock D, Schmidt RJ, Bogan D, et al. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of action. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34(12):1544-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00054-7

12. Gottrup F, Cullen BM, Karlsmark T, Bischoff-Mikkelsen M, Nisbet L, Gibson MC. Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2013;21(2):216-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12020

13. Omugha N, Jones AM. The management of hard-to-heal necrobiosis with PROMOGRAN. Br J Nurs. 2003;12(15 Suppl):S14-20.

14. Franceschini G, Visconti G, Terribile D, Fabbri C, Magno S, Di Leone A, et al. The role of oxidized regenerate cellulose to prevent cosmetic defects in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(7):966-71.

15. Temiz A, Ozturk C, Bakunov A, Kara K, Kaleli T. A new material for prevention of peritendinous fibrotic adhesions after tendon repair: oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed), an absorbable adhesion barrier. Int Orthop. 2008;32(3):389-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0335-8

16. Tausche A-K, Sebastian G. Wound conditioning of a deep tissue defect including exposed bone after tumour excision using PROMOGRAN* Matrix, a protease-modulating matrix. International Wound Journal. 2005;2(3):253-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00120.x

17. Romanelli M, Mulder G, Paggi B, Macchia M, Panduri S, Dini V. The use of a collagen matrix in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 2015;24(11):543-4, 6-7. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.11.543

18. Kakagia DD, Kazakos KJ, Xarchas KC, Karanikas M, Georgiadis GS, Tripsiannis G, et al. Synergistic action of protease-modulating matrix and autologous growth factors in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. A prospective randomized trial. Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2007;21(6):387-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.03.006

19. Veves A SPPHT. A randomized, controlled trial of promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Archives of Surgery. 2002;137(7):822-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.822

20. Hart J, Silcock D, Gunnigle S, Cullen B, Light ND, Watt PW. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in wound repair: effects in vitro on fibroblast biology and in vivo in a model of compromised healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34(12):1557-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00062-6

21. Bourdillon KA, Delury CP, Cullen BM. Biofilms and delayed healing - an in vitro evaluation of silver- and iodine-containing dressings and their effect on bacterial and human cells. Int Wound J. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12761

22. Ligi D, Mosti G, Croce L, Raffetto JD, Mannello F. Chronic venous disease – Part II: Proteolytic biomarkers in wound healing. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2016;1862(10):1900-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.07.011

23. Krishnaswamy VR, Mintz D, Sagi I. Matrix metalloproteinases: The sculptors of chronic cutaneous wounds. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular cell research. 2017;1864(11 Pt B):2220-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.08.003

24. Loh ML, Goh BKL, Kong Y, Varughese G, Ng JL, Lo ZJ, et al. Combination therapy of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver dressings with negative pressure wound therapy for coverage of exposed critical structures in complex lower-extremity wounds. Int Wound J. 2020;17(5):1356-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13406

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Teixeira Nicolosi, Silvana Cereijido Altran, Liliana Scorzoni, André Oliveira Paggiaro, Viviane Fernandes de Carvalho , Debora Levy, Rolf Gemperli, Cesar Isaac