Clinical Standardization of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Treatments in Complex Wounds: A Protocol for Biological Optimization and Evidence-Based Practice
PDF

Keywords

Platelet-Rich Plasma
Platelet-Rich Fibrin
Chronic Wounds
Wound Healing
Clinical Protocols
Regenerative Medicine

How to Cite

Clinical Standardization of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Treatments in Complex Wounds: A Protocol for Biological Optimization and Evidence-Based Practice. (2026). International Journal of Wound Research, 2(2), 169-172. https://doi.org/10.64115/ijwr-2026-524

Abstract

Introduction. Complex wounds represent a critical public health challenge, requiring effective adjuvant therapies to reverse cellular senescence. Autologous platelet derivatives, namely Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), concentrate essential growth factors to accelerate tissue regeneration. However, the lack of methodological standardization limits clinical reproducibility.

Objective. To develop and scientifically validate a structured nursing protocol for the preparation and clinical application of PRP and PRF in complex wounds.

Methods. Technical analysis and theoretical validation of institutional protocol EP431, cross-referencing operational parameters (relative centrifugal force, processing times, and handling techniques) with high-impact clinical trials.

Results. The protocol establishes a relative centrifugal force of 1500 x g for 9 minutes for PRP (separator gel tubes, inverted 5-8 times) and 700 x g for 15 minutes for PRF. Evidence confirms that these parameters maximize platelet integrity and sustained cytokine release. Intradermal/subcutaneous injection techniques (0.1 mL/cm), an optimal 4-5 day application interval, and advanced perilesional silicone barriers are detailed.

Conclusion. Clinical standardization via protocol EP431 mitigates biological variability, ensuring a safe, reproducible, and robust evidence-based intervention.

PDF

References

1. Meznerics FA, Fehérvári P, Dembrovszky F, Kovács KD, Kemény LV, Csupor D, et al. Platelet Rich Plasma in Chronic Wound Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):7345. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247532

2. Sousa HM, Gonçalves V. Protocol for platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet rich fibrin (PRF) aplication in complex wounds. Poster EP431. European Wound Management Association (EWMA) 2024 Conference; May 1-2, 2024; London, United Kingdom

3. Zhang W, Guo Y, Kuss M, Shi W, Aldrich AL, Untrauer J, et al. Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Tissue Infection: Preparation and Clinical Evaluation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(3):225-236. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0309

4. Eppley BL, Woodell JE, Higgins J. Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet rich plasma: implications for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1502-1508. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000138251.07040.51

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Hugo Miguel Sousa