Abstract
Background. The patient hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires continuous and intensified care performed by the nursing team. It consists in providing comprehensive care, monitoring and support of vital functions, as well as a regular toilet in the bronchial tree. However, the increasing incidence of nosocomial infections in patients treated in ICUs is still observed. It is closely related to the use of highly specialized, often invasive methods, such as mechanical ventilation. One of the nosocomial infections associated with tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Objectives. The main aim of the study was to compare of the assessment of two methods of the bronchial tree toilet. The secondary aim is to improve the quality of nursing care in patients with VAP in the ICU based on the analysis of the obtained results. Material and methods. The study involved a group of 30 patients of the Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital with the Polyclinic in Wroclaw. All patients required mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours due to acute respiratory failure. The studied group of patients was divided according to the type of technique used to provide the toilet of the bronchial tree: group I (n = 13) – suction in the open system and group II (n = 17) – suction in a closed system. In all patients a bronchial swab was collected with the blind bronchial sampling (BBS) method and the obtained material was transferred to the microbiological diagnostic laboratory. In addition, patient demographics and the general state of the APACHE II scale were analyzed. Observation was terminated at the end of mechanical ventilation and extubation of the trachea or due to death of the patient. Results. Among the causes of respiratory failure in the examined group of patients, the state after sudden cardiac arrest was found (n = 10), multi-organ trauma (n = 8), craniocerebral trauma (n = 7) and others (n = 5). The average length of ICU stay in group I was 13 days, and in group II – 11 days. The number of microbiological tests performed in group I was 70, and in group II – 78. The negative microbiological test in group I was obtained by 2 out of 5 patients until the end of the study, and in group II it was 4 out of 6 patients. The most common type of microorganism for group I was Staphylococcus aureus positive on the day 0 (n = 4), 3 (n = 4), 6 (n = 4) and 9 (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the day 12 (n = 2) . In turn, the most common type of microorganism for group II was Acinetobacter baumani positive at 0 (n = 5), 3 (n = 5), 6 (n = 5), 9 (n = 3) and 12 (n = 2). The studied group of patients did not differ significantly in terms of demographic data (mean age 36 years in group I and 42 in group II, sex distribution is 9 men and 4 women in group I and 9 men and 8 women in group II) and in the starting a clinical condition assessed on the APACHE II scale (score 20 points for group I and 21 points for group II). Conclusions. The use of a closed suction system allows the maintenance of sterility of the lower respiratory tract for the entire period (12 days) of ICU treatment with the use of a respirator, and the open system ensures sterile culture only until the 6th day of treatment. The knowledge of nursing staff in the care of mechanically ventilated patients is an important element of VAP prevention. The application of the method of collecting material from the lower respiratory tract in everyday practice is an element of properly conducted strategy of microbiological diagnostics with the involvement of nursing staff.References
Kusza K, Kübler A, Maciejewski D, et al. Guidelines of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy determining principles, conditions and organisational aspects of anaesthesiology and intensive therapy services. Anest Intens Ter 2012; 44(4): 201–212.
Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. JAMA 1995; 274: 639–644.
Raport roczny o zakażeniach zakładowych i drobnoustrojach alarmowych za okres od 01.01. do 31.12.2008. Wrocław: 4. Wojskowy Szpital Kliniczny z Polikliniką SPZOZ we Wrocławiu – Zespół Kontroli Zakażeń; 2009.
Łysenko L. Przyczyny i sposoby zwalczania zakażeń wewnątrz oddziału intensywnej terapii. Materiały VIII Konferencji Szkoleniowo-Naukowej „Anestezjologia i Intensywna Terapia lat 90-tych”. 1998: 5–24.
Dzierżanowska D, red. Zakażenia szpitalne. Wyd. 2. Bielsko-Biała: Alfa-Medica Press; 2008.
Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, et al. Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumoniae, 2003 recommendations of the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Respir Care 2004; 49(8): 926–939.
Szreter T. Wpływ bakterii jamy ustnej na zakażenia szpitalne. Zakażenia 2007; 7(6): 94–98.
Cook DJ, Walter SD, Cook RJ, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(6): 433–440.
Fleischer M, Bober B. Podstawy pielęgniarstwa epidemiologicznego. Wrocław: Urban & Partner; 2006.
Łazowski T, Maciejewski D. Specyfika zakażeń w oddziałach intensywnej terapii: zapalenie płuc związane ze stosowaniem wentylacji mechanicznej (cz. I). Zakażenia 2006; 6(6): 23–26.
Niederman MS, Craven DE, Bonten MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171(4): 388–416.
Kalanuria AA, Zai W, Mirski M. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the ICU. Crit Care 2014; 18(2): 208, doi: 10.1186/cc13775.
Nseir S, Di Pompeo C, Pronnier P, et al. Nosocomial tracheobronchitis in mechanically ventilated patients: incidence, aetiology and outcome. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: 1483–1489.
Piątek A, red. Standardy opieki pielęgniarskiej w praktyce. Przewodnik metodyczny. Warszawa: Naczelna Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych; 1999.
Wołowica L, Dyk D, red. Anestezjologia i intensywna opieka. Klinika i pielęgniarstwo. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2007.
Wood AY, Davit AJ, Ciraulo DL, et al. A prospective assessment of diagnostic efficacy of blind protective bronchial brushings compared to bronchoscope-assisted lavage, bronchoscope-directed brushings, and blind endotracheal aspirates in ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Trauma 2003; 55(5): 825–834.
Rajasekhar T, Anuradha K, Suhasini T, et al. The role of quantitative cultures of non-bronchoscopic samples in ventilator associated pneumonia. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006; 24(2): 107–113.
Naved SA, Siddiqui S, Khan FH. APACHE-II score correlation with mortality and length of stay in an intensive care unit. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011; 21(1): 4–8.
Śmiechowicz J. Prognostic scoring systems for mortality in intensive care units – the APACHE model. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015; 47: 87–88.
Lorente L, Lecuona M, Martín MM, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia using a closed versus an open tracheal suction system. Crit Care Med 2005; 33(1): 115–119.
Kock KS, Maurici R. Respiratory mechanics, ventilator-associated pneumonia and outcomes in intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med 2018; 7(1): 24–30.
Timsit JF, Esaied W, Neuville M, et al. Update on ventilator-associated pneumonia. F1000Res 2017; 6: 2061, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12222.1.
Chastre J, Fagon J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 867–903.
Dosher WB, Loomis EC, Richardson SL, et al. The effect of a nurse-led multidisciplinary team on ventilator-associated pneumonia rates. Crit Care Res Pract 2014; 2014: 682621, doi: 10.1155/2014/682621.
Boltey E, Yakusheva O, Costa DK. 5 Nursing strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am Nurse Today 2017; 12(6): 42–43.