Improving the Quality of Smartphone-Based Medical Photography for Burns Patients: A Quality Improvement Project
PDF

Keywords

Burn
Documentation
Image Enhancement
Photography
Quality Improvement
Smartphone
Wounds and Injuries

How to Cite

Improving the Quality of Smartphone-Based Medical Photography for Burns Patients: A Quality Improvement Project. (2026). International Journal of Wound Research, 2(1), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.64115/ijwr-2026-244

Abstract

Introduction. High-quality clinical photography is essential in burns management, providing an objective record of wound progression, supporting multidisciplinary communication, and fulfilling medico-legal requirements. Smartphone photography is increasingly used for bedside documentation because of its speed and accessibility, but image quality is often inconsistent, and no standardised guidelines currently exist. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve the quality of smartphone-based burns photography in a busy burns unit.

Methods. A retrospective review of 200 patient image sets was undertaken at Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester. 100 pre-intervention and 100 post-intervention image sets were assessed against eight parameters adapted from best practice guidelines, including clarity, lighting, background, wound coverage, perpendicular angle, distance, inclusion of close-up and distant views, and documentation of wound location. A concise guidance card containing prompts addressing key photography standards was attached to clinical smartphones to support staff during image capture. Statistical analysis was performed using a chi-square test for independent samples.

Results. Post-intervention, documentation of wound location improved significantly from 17% to 45% (p < 0.001). Modest, non-significant improvements were observed in adequate lighting (57% to 69%) and perpendicular imaging (77% to 85%). Full wound capture increased from 71% to 79%. However, inclusion of both close-up and distant images declined from 39% to 19% (p = 0.002), while other parameters remained largely unchanged.

Discussion and Conclusions. A simple, low-cost intervention produced measurable improvements in the consistency of burns photography, particularly in documentation of wound location. While gains were modest in other domains, the findings suggest that structured visual prompts can improve the consistency of clinical documentation practices. This project highlights the feasibility of low-resource interventions to enhance wound imaging quality. The approach is scalable to other units and healthcare systems, with potential to improve patient safety, communication, and clinical governance. Further studies should assess sustainability and adaptation in wider clinical contexts.

PDF

References

1. Milner SM. Classification of Burn Depth. Eplasty. 2024;24:QA5. Published 2024 Feb 28.

2. Zoltie T, Blome-Eberwein S, Forbes S, Theaker M, Hussain W. Medical photography using mobile devices. BMJ. 2022 Aug 26;378:e067663. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067663.

3. Parsa S, Basagaoglu B, Mackley K, Aitson P, Kenkel J, Amirlak B. Current and Future Photography Techniques in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 Nov 29;4:ojab050. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojab050

4. Thornton SM, Attaluri PK, Wirth PJ, Shaffrey EC, George RE, Carbullido MK, Rao VK. Picture Perfect: Standardizing and Safekeeping Clinical Photography in Plastic Surgery. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Mar 20;6:ojae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae012

5. Wongvibulsin S, Feterik K. Recommendations for Better Adoption of Medical Photography as a Clinical Tool. Interact J Med Res. 2022 Jul 18;11(2):e36102. https://doi.org/10.2196/36102

6. Hsin PH, Lee TT, Liu CY, Chou SS, Mills ME. Exploring the Effectiveness of Nurses' Usage of a Wound-Photography System. Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Jun 1;42(6):430-439. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001095

7. Graham PH, Plant NA, Graham JL, et al. Digital photography as source documentation of skin toxicity: an analysis from the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 04.01 post-mastectomy radiation skin care trial. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(4):458-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02365.x

8. Li MK, Howard DP, King R. "A picture tells a thousand words" smartphone-based secure clinical image transfer improves compliance in open fracture management. Injury. 2019;50(7):1284-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.010

9. Özkök A, Akar T, Demirel B. The effect of photography training on the accurate representation of gunshot and stab wounds in autopsies: a comparative study. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024;20(4):1166-1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00750-y

10. Liu CH, Lin IC, Lu JJ, Cai D. A Smartphone App for Improving Clinical Photography in Emergency Departments: Comparative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(7):e14531. Published 2019 Jul 31. https://doi.org/10.2196/14531

11. Bruce J, Knight R, Parsons N, et al. Wound photography for evaluation of surgical site infection and wound healing after lower limb trauma. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(12):1802-1808. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B12.BJJ-2021-0447.R1

12. Greig PR, Zolger D, Onwochei DN, Thurley N, Higham H, Desai N. Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(3):343-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15939

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Burgess, Miriam Nyeko-Lacek, Zeeshan Sheikh